Cholesterol 2022: Part 1, WBC count

-

Recently I underwent my usual annual health screening test. I usually go for the cheapest package that must include haematology profile, lipid profile, kidney function, liver function, CA 19.9 and CEA. As usual, the most appropriate package has other tests too but this time I opted to also add cardio-vascular disease risk assessment.

Thankfully, all results were fine. Below are more details on the lipid profile and WBC count results.

Cholesterol results compared to 4 months ago:

                                 Sep 2021        Ref. range        Jan 2022          Ref
Total cholesterol           4.9               < 5.17                5.2               <5.2
HDL ("good")               1.5               > 1.03                1.81            >1.04
LDL ("bad")                 3.1               < 2.6                   3.0             < 2.6
Triglycerides                 0.5               < 1.69                0.8              <1.7
Total/HDL ratio                                                           2.9              <5.0
Non-HDL                     3.4               < 3.36                 3.4              <3.4
LDL / HDL                   2.0                < 2.0

 

So they're about the same. I'm a little surprised because I couldn't exercise as much because it's been rainy the past 4 months and so I couldn't swim and I stopped the walking exercise so not to aggravate my knee pain.

The question is whether it can be at least this good if I further reduce the intake of fenofibrate from 4x weekly to 3x weekly.

My WBC count remains at 3.1 while neutrophil is at 58.3% i.e. count of 1.8.  So that's good news although WBC count is considered low but at least it's normal for me and more importantly, the hematologist was comfortable with that level. I'm still abstaining from taking vitamin supplement on daily basis and to take them only when I'm sick.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fell Seal: Arbiter's Mark - character build (Part 1)

-
Here are the character builds for my current run (with the help of Ban): Kyrie Fellblade/Marked Counter: Slow Secondary passives: Execute, Life Font Fellblade itself is a good class because of the various conditions it can inflict and most importantly they can inflict Sleep. Iirc, the only other human class that can do this is Gadgeteer. Their passive Malice increases the chance of landing it by 10%. Fellblade pairs well with Marked because both use ATK and MND in their offensive abilities. Also, Fellblade's abilities are mostly short range whereas Marked has some long range abilities. Execute for more damage. Life Font is for suvivability. Ban opined that with two healers, there's no need for Life Font but I discover that it enables Kyrie to survive just enough for a healer to heal her up, after having received massive damage. Ban advocated for Marked/Fellblade for superior Speed (1.00 vs 0.92) and defense (heavy armor). I resisted this for a long time because I
Read more

Fell Seal: Arbiter's Mark - character build (Part 2)

-
(continue from Part 1 ) Yates Anatomist/Wizard Counter: Cripple Secondary passives: Blessed One, Smart Casting Anatomist is the best healer in game due to the passive Legendary Healer, which also then boost the amount of self-healing by Blessed One. Although Ban thinks Anatomist's Dark spells are sufficient in dealing damage and so he suggests Alchemyst as Yate's secondary class, I choose Wizard for the following reasons: Quite often, demonic creatures have Dark immunity and other creatures have immunity to other elements. So having Dark, Water, Fire, Earth and Thunder spells enable Yates to cast the most suitable spell, especially when the enemies are vulnerable to certain elements. Flexible casting :) Smart Casting is useful so that I don't need to worry much about the positioning of the enemies relative to my other characters when using Mass Healing and the area effect damage spells. As stated in previous post , there "are so many devastating Skill ba
Read more

Strange expectorant

-
Image
An expectorant cough syrup helps you to prevent phlegem from going to your lungs by expelling it via coughing or so I heard from doctors and pharmacists. That's why for cough that's caused by phlegm, it is not advisable to take suppressant cough syrup. Given that's the role, do you expect it to be drowsy? It should be non-drowsy so that you will be actively coughing out the phlegm, right? Not this Unizet expectorant. The doctor told me that it shouldn't be drowsy and yet some of his patients (including me) reported otherwise. I read the detailed information (on the piece of paper typically stuffed inside the box) and nowhere it indicated drowsiness as a side effect. Strange, huh?
Read more